Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Odontol. vital ; (30): 45-50, ene.-jun. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, SaludCR | ID: biblio-1091412

ABSTRACT

Resumen El propósito del estudio fue comparar in vitro la resistencia adhesiva de los sistemas Etch and rinse (grabado y enjuague), 4ta y 5ta generación; y los sistemas Self Etch (autograbado), 6ta y 7ma generación. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, comparativo. Se utilizaron 20 terceros molares extraídos por motivos ortodóncico y profilácticos. Los cuales fueron cortados por la mitad y se obtuvo 40 muestras, en forma aleatoria los dientes fueron divididos en cuatro grupos, 10 con 4ta generación, 10 con 5ta, 10 con 6ta y 10 con 7ma. Se realizó una prueba de tracción vertical medida en kilogramos fuerza, para luego ser transformados a megapascales (Mpa). Las resinas de 4ta generación obtuvieron una resistencia adhesiva de 29,9 Mpa, las de 5ta una resistencia de 16,9 Mpa, la de 6ta una resistencia de 27,5 Mpa y las de 7ma generación una resistencia de 11,0 Mpa. Los resultados se sometieron a pruebas de normalidad mediante la prueba de Shapiro Wilk, y que fueron analizados mediante el ANOVA de un factor, y se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los cuatro grupos de estudio con un valor p de 0,001. Se concluye que el sistema adhesivo de 4ta generación clasificado como Etch and Rinse presentó mejor resistencia adhesiva, seguido del adhesivo de 6ta generación clasificado como Self Etch.


Abstract The purpose of the study was to compare in vitro the adhesive strength of the Etch and Rinse systems of the 4th and 5th generation; and Self Etch systems of the 6th and 7th generation. A descriptive, comparative study was carried out. Twenty third molars were used for this study, (these molars were extracted for orthodontic and prophylactic purposes). Each teeth were cut into two pieces obtaining 40 pieces in total, then they were chosen randomly of which 10 pieces were cut with the 4th generation adhesive strength, 10 with the 5th generation, 10with the 6th generation and 10th with the 7th generation of the adhesive. A vertical traction test was performed, measured in kilograms force, and then transformed into megapascals (Mpa). The 4th generation resins obtained an adhesive resistance of 29.9 Mpa, the 5th generation resins obtained a resistance of 16.9 Mpa, the 6th generation obtained a resistance of 27.5 Mpa and the 7th generation obtained a resistance of 11.0 Mpa. The results were subjected to normality tests using the Shapiro Wilk test. These results were analyzed using the oneway ANOVA, finding statistically significant differences between the four study groups with a p-value of 0.001. As a conclusion; the 4th generation adhesive system classified as Etch and Rinse showed better adhesive strength, followed by the 6th generation adhesive system classified as Self Etch .


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/therapeutic use , Dental Caries , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Dental Etching
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL